Last updated: 2025-04-22

Checks: 1 1

Knit directory: HairCort-Evaluation-Nist2020/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.


The R Markdown file has unstaged changes. To know which version of the R Markdown file created these results, you’ll want to first commit it to the Git repo. If you’re still working on the analysis, you can ignore this warning. When you’re finished, you can run wflow_publish to commit the R Markdown file and build the HTML.

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 82ad928. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .DS_Store
    Ignored:    .RData
    Ignored:    .Rhistory
    Ignored:    analysis/.DS_Store
    Ignored:    analysis/.Rhistory
    Ignored:    data/.DS_Store
    Ignored:    data/Test3/.DS_Store
    Ignored:    data/Test4/.DS_Store

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   analysis/ELISA_Calc_FinalVals_test4.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/ELISA_QC_test3.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/ELISA_QC_test4.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/Test5_design.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/about.Rmd
    Modified:   analysis/index.Rmd
    Modified:   data/Test3/Data_QC_flagged.csv

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.


These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd) and HTML (docs/index.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
Rmd d314be6 Paloma 2025-01-29 updates
html d314be6 Paloma 2025-01-29 updates
Rmd 5c064f5 Paloma 2025-01-16 update description
html 76f7f11 Paloma 2024-11-11 afd
html 016578f Paloma 2024-11-11 gjhghukj
Rmd 8c54674 Paloma 2024-11-11 upodaptes
html 8c54674 Paloma 2024-11-11 upodaptes
Rmd 4c08739 Paloma 2024-11-11 updating file names
html 4c08739 Paloma 2024-11-11 updating file names
Rmd f033eb8 Paloma 2024-11-11 update page names
html f033eb8 Paloma 2024-11-11 update page names
Rmd 01e25c6 Paloma 2024-11-11 reorg documents
html 01e25c6 Paloma 2024-11-11 reorg documents
Rmd 7258162 Paloma 2024-11-09 improved explanations of experiment
html 7258162 Paloma 2024-11-09 improved explanations of experiment
Rmd e435bbc Paloma 2024-10-25 update result plots_non spiked
html e435bbc Paloma 2024-10-25 update result plots_non spiked
html 91fbafe Paloma 2024-10-17 Build site.
Rmd f42c096 Paloma 2024-10-17 index
html f42c096 Paloma 2024-10-17 index
Rmd 14c1638 Paloma 2024-10-17 update links again
html 14c1638 Paloma 2024-10-17 update links again
Rmd e8567d9 Paloma 2024-10-17 update links
html e8567d9 Paloma 2024-10-17 update links
html e56ef2f Paloma 2024-10-17 Build site.
html 8e75be7 Paloma 2024-10-17 Update index.html
html f28b5e3 Paloma 2024-10-17 Build site.
html 4ee17fb Paloma 2024-10-17 Build site.
Rmd 70a7581 Paloma 2024-10-17 about page and index
html 2ed0880 Paloma 2024-10-17 Build site.
Rmd 4594242 Paloma 2024-10-17 about page
html 35b1a01 GitHub 2024-10-17 Update index.html
html 62a7e39 GitHub 2024-10-17 Update index.html
html 4e7632d Paloma 2024-10-17 Update index.html
html e4cf6f3 Paloma 2024-10-16 initial files
Rmd fd1d59b Paloma 2024-10-16 Start workflowr project.

Evaluation of Nist et al. 2020

This protocol is different from others in that it should make possible to quantify cortisol in low-mass hair samples (i.e. less than 20 mg). The study conducted by Nist et al. quantifies cortisol in hair samples form neonates, but to our knowledge, it has not been tested with low-mass adult samples.

The increased sensibility of Nist et al. 2020 is provided by two modifications in the traditional protocol:

I tested this protocol by running an ELISA plate with 40 samples from one adult individual. In order to find optimal parameters for my adult samples, I tested different mass, dilution, and the addition (or not) of a spike.

The results suggest that the method proposed by Nist et al. 2020 does not produce reliable results, and does not allow us to quantify cortisol from adult hair. However, it remains a question if using lower-mass samples would result in accurate results (more testing forthcoming).

Among the non-spiked samples, and using a double extraction, we found that a dilution of 250 uL, and using between 20 to 35 mg of hair provides the most consistent results.

This is how data is obtained:

   Plate reader
    |
    |____ optical density (absorbance) 
           |
           |____ Myassays.com (data quality, 
                 |              binding percentages, 
                 |              conc. values (without accounting 
                 |              for weight/dilution/spike)) 
                 |              
                 |____ Data cleaning (ELISA_QC_test#)
                 |     |
                 |     |____ Analysis raw values
                 |
                 |
                 |____ Calculation of final cortisol values (pg/mg)
                       |
                       |____ Analysis of final cortisol values

Find more details in the pages below:

Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Comments
Data cleaning Test3 Test4
Analysis of raw results Test3 Test4 Exploration of binding percentages, with the goal of identifying optimal variable values for data generation, so they fall within the ranges measured accurately by the ELISA
Calculation of cortisol values Test3 Test4 Transformation of raw values obtained from ELISA to cortisol concentration in pg/mL
Models to identify variables affecting binding percentages Test3